Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.5 Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 22.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderTencentStepFun
Noometry Index41.342.3
Released—2026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding13611436

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13741411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math13591408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert13391421

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13631385
LMArena Chinese14171447
LMArena French13911421
LMArena German13551405
LMArena Japanese13421354
LMArena Korean13511352
LMArena Russian13681385
LMArena Spanish—1419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13441385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13661402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text13771403
LMArena Creative Writing13591357
LMArena Multi-Turn13871405

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper