Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.5 to 27.3.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index40.629.1
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding13611040
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13741028

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math13591089

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1338984

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13621000
LMArena Chinese14161016
LMArena French13901038
LMArena German13561006
LMArena Japanese1338899
LMArena Korean1351856
LMArena Russian13681004
LMArena Spanish—1058

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13441023

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1365996

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text13771050
LMArena Creative Writing13581024
LMArena Multi-Turn1387989

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper