Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 49.1.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1319 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1316 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1273 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1275 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.