Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 50.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1347 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1322 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1305 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1308 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1268 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1299 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.