Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs o3

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

o3 OpenAI

47.5

Rank #61 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.6 to 37.0.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index41.347.5
Released—2025-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked1663

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), o3: 46.8 (#64)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Coding13611408
SWE-bench Verified—62.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—58.4%
Aider Polyglot—81.3%
GSO—8.8%
WeirdML—52.4%
CadEval—74%
ALE-Bench—933.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, o3: 34.5 (#44)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—30.8%
DeepResearch Bench—45.2%
OSWorld—23%
LMArena Search—1144
METR Time Horizons—65.4%

Reasoning o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), o3: 32.0 (#78)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741402
ARC-AGI-2—6.5%
SimpleBench—53.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—60.8%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—38%
EnigmaEval—13.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—84.8%
LMCA—39.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.86
ForecastBench—62.5

Math o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), o3: 50.2 (#58)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Math13591426
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
Omni-MATH—71.4%
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—18.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), o3: 54.6 (#52)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Expert13391402
GPQA Diamond—81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—20.3%
SimpleQA Verified—49.4%
MMLU-Pro—85.9%
Confabulations—14.4%
GPQA (HELM)—75.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, o3: 41.4 (#36)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Vision—1214
GeoBench—74%
VPCT—52%

Multilingual o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), o3: 51.7 (#105)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Non-English13631401
LMArena Chinese14171437
LMArena French13911430
LMArena German13551420
LMArena Japanese13421403
LMArena Korean13511370
LMArena Russian13681406
LMArena Spanish—1395

Instruction Following o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), o3: 72.8 (#127)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Instruction Following13441368
IFEval—86.9%

Long Context o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), o3: 53.3 (#6)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Longer Query13661372
Fiction.LiveBench—88.9%
CL-bench—17.8%

Writing & Preference o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), o3: 63.5 (#64)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226o3
LMArena Text13771410
LMArena Creative Writing13591359
LMArena Multi-Turn13871405
Short-Story Creative Writing—83.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1676
WildBench—86.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and o3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.

Related comparisons

Go deeper