Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiniMax-M2

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 19.4.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index41.337.4
Released—2025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1621

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding13611370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts13741357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Math13591352

Knowledge Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert13391337

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English13631313
LMArena Chinese14171366
LMArena French13911335
LMArena German13551355
LMArena Russian13681331
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1351—
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following13441328

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query13661331

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M2
LMArena Text13771340
LMArena Creative Writing13591286
LMArena Multi-Turn13871361

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiniMax-M2?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 39.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiniMax-M2 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper