Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Llama 3-70B

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 12.8.
  • Llama 3-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index41.328.8
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1631

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Coding13611206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.93
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Math13591218
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Expert13391149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English13631142
LMArena Chinese14171114
LMArena French13911232
LMArena German13551169
LMArena Japanese13421017
LMArena Korean13511017
LMArena Russian13681159
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following13441194

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query13661174

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Llama 3-70B
LMArena Text13771221
LMArena Creative Writing13591210
LMArena Multi-Turn13871223

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Llama 3-70B?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Llama 3-70B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper