Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Inkling

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Inkling Thinking Machines Lab

44.1

Rank #80 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling leads 55.1 to 37.0.
  • Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
ProviderTencentThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index41.344.1
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—66K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.87
Output $ / M tokens—$4.68
Results tracked1641

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Coding13611464
FrontierCode—14%
LMArena WebDev—1413
FrontierSWE—4.1%
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—32.3%
ALE-Bench—946

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
APEX-Agents—33.8%
τ²-bench Banking—25%

Reasoning Inkling leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Hard Prompts13741451
ARC-AGI-2—36.5%
SimpleBench—50%
ARC-AGI-1—79.5%
CritPt—5.4%
Chess Puzzles—21%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—148.54

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Math13591479
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—4.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—0%

Knowledge Inkling leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Expert13391465
GPQA Diamond—88.3%
SimpleQA Verified—40.3%

Multilingual Inkling leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Non-English13631434
LMArena Chinese14171490
LMArena French13911458
LMArena German13551446
LMArena Japanese13421429
LMArena Korean13511404
LMArena Russian13681429
LMArena Spanish—1448

Instruction Following Inkling leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Instruction Following13441426

Long Context Inkling leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Longer Query13661434

Writing & Preference Inkling leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling
LMArena Text13771441
LMArena Creative Writing13591387
LMArena Multi-Turn13871436
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1611
EQ-Bench 4—1226

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Inkling better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Inkling share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper