Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen3 14B
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 26.1 to 18.5.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 35.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen3 14B?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen3 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.