Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 12.6.
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 29.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.51 |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 29.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.