Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 19.3.
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.631.9
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked1143

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Coding13191292
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13081271
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Math12731283
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
Omni-MATH—33%
MATH Level 5—63.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%
MMLU—85.3%
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English12851252
LMArena Chinese13581272
LMArena Russian13051264
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Spanish—1256

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12781254
IFEval—80.6%

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13091282

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text13111269
LMArena Creative Writing12691221
LMArena Multi-Turn13031272
WildBench—80.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper