Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs o3

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.0

Rank #165 Confirmed

o3 OpenAI

47.4

Rank #53 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where o3 leads 48.9 to 32.9.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110o3
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index39.047.4
Released—2025-04-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$8
Results tracked1163

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), o3: 47.3 (#57)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Coding13201408
SWE-bench Verified—62.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—58.4%
Aider Polyglot—81.3%
GSO—8.8%
WeirdML—52.4%
CadEval—74%
ALE-Bench—933.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, o3: 34.3 (#42)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—63%
GDPval—30.8%
DeepResearch Bench—45.2%
OSWorld—23%
LMArena Search—1144
METR Time Horizons—65.4%

Reasoning o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), o3: 32.1 (#66)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Hard Prompts13081402
ARC-AGI-2—6.5%
SimpleBench—53.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—67.6%
ARC-AGI-1—60.8%
CritPt—1.4%
Chess Puzzles—38%
EnigmaEval—13.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—29%
DTBench—84.8%
LMCA—39.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.88
ForecastBench—62.5

Math o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), o3: 48.9 (#49)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Math12731426
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—33.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
Omni-MATH—71.4%
MATH Level 5—97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—18.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, o3: 54.5 (#47)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
GPQA Diamond—81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—20.3%
SimpleQA Verified—49.4%
MMLU-Pro—85.9%
Confabulations—14.4%
GPQA (HELM)—75.3%
LMArena Expert—1403

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, o3: 40.7 (#35)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Vision—1214
GeoBench—74%
VPCT—52%

Multilingual o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), o3: 51.9 (#99)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Non-English12851402
LMArena Chinese13581438
LMArena Russian13051407
LMArena French—1430
LMArena German—1420
LMArena Japanese—1404
LMArena Korean—1371
LMArena Spanish—1395

Instruction Following o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), o3: 73.0 (#122)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Instruction Following12791368
IFEval—86.9%

Long Context o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), o3: 53.2 (#6)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Longer Query13091372
Fiction.LiveBench—88.9%
CL-bench—17.8%

Writing & Preference o3 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), o3: 63.7 (#62)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o3
LMArena Text13111410
LMArena Creative Writing12691359
LMArena Multi-Turn13031405
Short-Story Creative Writing—83.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1676
WildBench—86.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than o3?

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.4 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or o3 better for coding?

o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and o3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.

Related comparisons

Go deeper