Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs o1

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

o1 OpenAI

40.9

Rank #143 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 39.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and o1 specifications
Hunyuan Turbo 0110o1
ProviderTencentOpenAI
Noometry Index39.640.9
Released—2024-09-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$15
Output $ / M tokens—$60
Results tracked1152

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), o1: 46.1 (#70)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Coding13191367
Aider Polyglot—61.7%
WeirdML—47.6%
LiveBench Coding—69.7%
CadEval—56%
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—80.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—51.1%

Reasoning o1 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), o1: 27.9 (#111)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Hard Prompts13081371
SimpleBench—41.7%
ARC-AGI-1—30.7%
Chess Puzzles—15%
EnigmaEval—5.7%
LiveBench Reasoning—91.6%
DTBench—74.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis—65.5%
LMCA—22.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—141.91
LiveBench—75.7%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), o1: 36.1 (#175)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Math12731388
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—14.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
LiveBench Math—80.3%
MATH Level 5—94.7%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—9.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, o1: 41.5 (#110)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
GPQA Diamond—76.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—8%
SimpleQA Verified—41.1%
Confabulations—11.7%
LMArena Expert—1361

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Vision—1168
GeoBench—80%
VPCT—37%
SpatialViz-Bench—41.4%

Multilingual o1 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), o1: 48.6 (#142)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Non-English12851358
LMArena Chinese13581394
LMArena Russian13051356
LMArena French—1344
LMArena German—1337
LMArena Japanese—1346
LMArena Korean—1396
LMArena Spanish—1345

Instruction Following o1 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), o1: 74.8 (#86)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Instruction Following12781367
LiveBench Instruction Following—81.5%

Long Context o1 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), o1: 50.3 (#9)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Longer Query13091378
Fiction.LiveBench—83.3%

Writing & Preference o1 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), o1: 55.6 (#144)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110o1
LMArena Text13111366
LMArena Creative Writing12691348
LMArena Multi-Turn13031369
Short-Story Creative Writing—70.2%
LiveBench Language—65.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than o1?

o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or o1 better for coding?

o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and o1 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.

Related comparisons

Go deeper