Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Mistral Medium

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Medium in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium leads 60.0 to 50.2.
  • Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index39.636.3
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Coding13191434
FrontierCode—8%
SciCode—40.2%
WeirdML—43.7%
ALE-Bench—763.98

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.7%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts13081426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—75.5%
LMCA—26.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—26.9%

Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Math12731408
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—32.2%
ProofBench—9%
MATH Level 5—81.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
GPQA Diamond—59.5%
Humanity's Last Exam—4.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—22.7%
LMArena Expert—1408

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Vision—1172

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Non-English12851408
LMArena Chinese13581447
LMArena Russian13051411
LMArena French—1459
LMArena German—1432
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Spanish—1433

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following12781398

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query13091406

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbo 0110Mistral Medium
LMArena Text13111424
LMArena Creative Writing12691391
LMArena Multi-Turn13031418
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Mistral Medium?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Mistral Medium better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Mistral Medium share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper