Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Mercury 2
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Mercury 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Mercury 2 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 38.6 to 33.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1358 |
Multilingual Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1304 |
Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1329 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1330 |
Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Mercury 2?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Mercury 2 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 39.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Mercury 2 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Mercury 2 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.