Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 62.5 to 50.4.
- Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-07-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.57 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.30 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 42 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | 1399 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 63.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 59.1% |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 42.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 597.5 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 35.7% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 59.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 59.2% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1384 |
| SimpleBench | — | 26.3% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 64.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.02 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.2 |
Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1396 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 65.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 81.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 20.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 17.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1363 |
Multilingual Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1372 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | — | 1379 |
| LMArena German | — | 1386 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1324 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1383 |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | 1347 |
| IFEval | — | 85% |
Long Context Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1353 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.6% |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1380 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1349 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1371 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 85.6% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1666 |
| WildBench | — | 86.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) better for coding?
Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.