Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Inkling
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Inkling in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling leads 40.6 to 25.0.
- Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 39.0 | 44.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 66K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.87 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.68 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168), Inkling: 34.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1320 | 1463 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1412 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Inkling: 29.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |
Reasoning Inkling leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135), Inkling: 40.6 (#48)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1452 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.6 |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180), Inkling: 31.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1482 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Inkling: 55.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1468 |
Multilingual Inkling leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178), Inkling: 54.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1495 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1453 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1442 |
Instruction Following Inkling leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190), Inkling: 75.3 (#65)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1279 | 1427 |
Long Context Inkling leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163), Inkling: 43.9 (#79)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1436 |
Writing & Preference Inkling leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176), Inkling: 65.5 (#48)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1390 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Inkling?
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 39.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Inkling better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Inkling share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.