Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Wizardlm 70b
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 34.8.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1081 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1079 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1052 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1155 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1093 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Wizardlm 70b?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Wizardlm 70b share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.