Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Phi-4 Mini

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Phi-4 Mini Microsoft

30.9

Rank #283 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.8 to 25.3.
  • Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi-4 Mini specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.530.9
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.075
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
SciCode—10.8%
LMArena Coding1390—

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
CritPt—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1399—

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Phi-4 Mini: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Math1414—

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.5%
LMArena Expert1395—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Phi-4 Mini: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Non-English1395—
LMArena Chinese1425—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1385—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Phi-4 Mini: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Instruction Following1374—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Phi-4 Mini: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Longer Query1384—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Phi-4 Mini: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi-4 Mini
LMArena Text1401—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Phi-4 Mini?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Phi-4 Mini better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi-4 Mini share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 Mini has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper