Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Nemo
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 28.5.
- Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 26.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-07-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 27.6% |
| BALROG | — | 17.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| DTBench | — | 48.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.68 |
| PIQA | — | 83.5% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 10.8% |
| GSM8K | — | 84.2% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 29.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 82.5% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Mistral Nemo: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 881 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Nemo?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Nemo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.