Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 47.0 to 40.2.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 44.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1487 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| DTBench | — | 84.5% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
Math MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1480 |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1501 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1449 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1507 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1450 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena German | — | 1455 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1477 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1440 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1493 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.