Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Magistral Medium
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 8.6.
- Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 35.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1319 |
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1267 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1250 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1223 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1227 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1224 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1254 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Magistral Medium?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Magistral Medium better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Magistral Medium share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.