Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Longcat Flash Chat

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Longcat Flash Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 1 category and Longcat Flash Chat in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 19.0.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
ProviderTencentMeituan
Noometry Index42.542.1
Released——
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding13901471

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts13991440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Too close to call

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14141442

Knowledge Longcat Flash Chat leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert13951454

Multilingual Too close to call

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English13951404
LMArena Chinese14251465
LMArena Korean14061371
LMArena Russian13851395
LMArena French—1456
LMArena German—1408
LMArena Japanese—1373
LMArena Spanish—1445

Instruction Following Longcat Flash Chat leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following13741411

Long Context Longcat Flash Chat leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query13841425

Writing & Preference Longcat Flash Chat leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Longcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14011427
LMArena Creative Writing13921388
LMArena Multi-Turn13931418

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Longcat Flash Chat?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Longcat Flash Chat score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.5 vs 42.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Longcat Flash Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper