Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Hy3
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 1 category and Hy3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 40.9.
- Hy3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 44.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0825 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.33 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
Math Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1475 |
Knowledge Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1460 |
Multilingual Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1426 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1493 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1432 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1426 |
Long Context Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Hy3 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1436 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Hy3?
Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Hy3 better for coding?
Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Hy3 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.