Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 34.2.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 51.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1484 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1460 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.7 Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.