Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 58.2 to 47.4.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.242.3
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Coding12701412
LMArena WebDev—1243
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12641404
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.98

Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Math12741407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Expert12481408
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English12621385
LMArena Chinese13191446
LMArena Russian12581379
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1389
LMArena Japanese—1369
LMArena Korean—1344
LMArena Spanish—1399

Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12451374

Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13011392

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text12741397
LMArena Creative Writing12421343
LMArena Multi-Turn12751393

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper