Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 34.2.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 39.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Qwen3 32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Qwen3 32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1362 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1311 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1305 |
Long Context Qwen3 32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.1 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3 32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.