Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.4

Rank #245 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 37.1 to 22.6.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.933.4
Released—2024-09-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—33K
Max output—29K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.66
Output $ / M tokens—$1
Results tracked1231

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Coding12701276
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9%
Aider Polyglot—16.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—49%
LiveBench Coding—56.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—58%
HumanEval+—87.2%
MBPP+—77%

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Hard Prompts12641251
LiveBench Reasoning—42.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—119.49
HellaSwag—83%
LiveBench—46.2%
WinoGrande—80.8%

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Math12741251
LiveBench Math—46.6%
GSM8K—93%

Knowledge Too close to call

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Expert12481221
ARC (AI2) Challenge—70.5%
MMLU—79.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Non-English12621205
LMArena Chinese13191222
LMArena Russian12581228

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Instruction Following12451223
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.7%

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Longer Query13011251

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
LMArena Text12741230
LMArena Creative Writing12421174
LMArena Multi-Turn12751222
LiveBench Language—23.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper