Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 34.2 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1148 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1164 |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1186 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1104 |
| LMArena French | — | 1159 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1141 |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.