Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen Max
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen Max in 4 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 21.0.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 34.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-03 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6.40 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1270 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1254 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1274 |
| LMArena French | — | 1329 |
| LMArena German | — | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1141 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1262 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1277 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen Max?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen Max better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.