Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 68.6 to 65.5.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1322 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1308 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1299 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.