Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs o3-pro
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 39.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 42.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $80 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 84.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 58.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 59.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| DTBench | — | 86.9% |
| LMCA | — | 38.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.43 |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 23.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), o3-pro: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 97.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o3-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than o3-pro?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or o3-pro better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o3-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.