Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs o1
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and o1 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where o1 leads 50.3 to 39.5.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 40.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 52 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), o1: 46.1 (#70)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1367 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 61.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 47.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 69.7% |
| CadEval | — | 56% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 89% |
| MBPP+ | — | 80.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, o1: 24.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 10% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 51.1% |
Reasoning o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), o1: 27.9 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1371 |
| SimpleBench | — | 41.7% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 30.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 15% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 91.6% |
| DTBench | — | 74.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| LMCA | — | 22.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 141.91 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.7% |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), o1: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 14.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 80.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 94.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 9.3% |
Knowledge o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), o1: 41.5 (#110)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1361 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 41.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 11.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, o1: 34.2 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1168 |
| GeoBench | — | 80% |
| VPCT | — | 37% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 41.4% |
Multilingual o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), o1: 48.6 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1358 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1356 |
| LMArena French | — | 1344 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1346 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1345 |
Instruction Following o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), o1: 74.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1367 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 81.5% |
Long Context o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), o1: 50.3 (#9)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1378 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference o1 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), o1: 55.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | o1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1366 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1348 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1369 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 70.2% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 65.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than o1?
o1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or o1 better for coding?
o1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.1 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and o1 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and o1 has 52.