Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Muse Spark
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 34.2.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 50.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1481 |
| SciCode | — | 51.5% |
Reasoning Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1474 |
| CritPt | — | 11.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 152.04 |
Math Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1455 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 17% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 39% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 14.6% |
Knowledge Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1457 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 89.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 40.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
Multilingual Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1464 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1509 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1466 |
| LMArena French | — | 1497 |
| LMArena German | — | 1497 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1459 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1472 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1442 |
Long Context Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1451 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Spark |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1474 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1459 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1477 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Muse Spark?
Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Muse Spark better for coding?
Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Muse Spark share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.