Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Muse Glimmer
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Glimmer leads 57.5 to 47.2.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1417 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1390 |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1375 |
Long Context Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Muse Glimmer?
Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.