Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mistral Small 3.2
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 24.9.
- Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.0938 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 131.73 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Mistral Small 3.2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mistral Small 3.2?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral Small 3.2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.