Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mistral
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 34.2 to 16.6.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1162 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1149 |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1180 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1109 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1168 |
| LMArena French | — | 1180 |
| LMArena German | — | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1032 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1143 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1153 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mistral?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mistral better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.