Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs MiniMax-M2.7

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.2 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 59.1 to 47.4.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index37.237.4
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1230

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.4 (#115)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Coding12701454
LMArena WebDev—1397
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#103)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.0 (#248)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Hard Prompts12641422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.84

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), MiniMax-M2.7: 24.9 (#254)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Math12741420
ProofBench—3%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.1 (#151)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Expert12481443
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.5 (#120)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English12621382
LMArena Chinese13191439
LMArena Russian12581383
LMArena French—1422
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1261
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.2 (#101)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following12451404

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#94)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query13011419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), MiniMax-M2.7: 59.1 (#107)

BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text12741404
LMArena Creative Writing12421354
LMArena Multi-Turn12751413

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.2 vs 37.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper