Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Llama 2-7B

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Llama 2-7B Meta

29.1

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 47.2 to 28.0.
  • Llama 2-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-7B specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.929.1
Released—2023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1229

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Coding12701002

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Hard Prompts12641009
Chess Puzzles—0%
BIG-Bench Hard—39.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—99.06
HellaSwag—77.2%
LAMBADA—73.3%
PIQA—78.8%
WinoGrande—69.2%

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Math12741042
GSM8K—16.7%

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Expert12481036
ARC (AI2) Challenge—45.9%
BoolQ—77.9%
MMLU—45.8%
OpenBookQA—58.6%
TriviaQA—73.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Llama 2-7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
ScienceQA—43.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Non-English1262973
LMArena Chinese1319973
LMArena Russian1258995
LMArena French—970
LMArena German—978
LMArena Spanish—1007

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Instruction Following12451006

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Longer Query1301999

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-7B
LMArena Text12741053
LMArena Creative Writing12421033
LMArena Multi-Turn12751029

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Llama 2-7B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Llama 2-7B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-7B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper