Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Kimi K2.7 Code Moonshot AI

43.3

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 53.5 to 34.2.
  • Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Kimi K2.7 Code specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.943.3
Released—2026-06-12
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
DeepSWE—30.5%
FrontierCode—30.1%
LMArena WebDev—1473
SciCode—47.5%
WeirdML—54.1%
LMArena Coding1270—
ALE-Bench—886.23

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
APEX-Agents—37.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—5,083

Reasoning Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
SimpleBench—57.9%
CritPt—10%
Chess Puzzles—21%
LMArena Hard Prompts1264—
Surface Evolver Bench—48.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.97

Math Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—54%
FrontierMath Tier 4—12.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
LMArena Math1274—

Knowledge Kimi K2.7 Code leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
GPQA Diamond—87.9%
SimpleQA Verified—36.5%
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Non-English1262—
LMArena Chinese1319—
LMArena Russian1258—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Instruction Following1245—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Kimi K2.7 Code: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Kimi K2.7 Code
LMArena Text1274—
LMArena Creative Writing1242—
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

Kimi K2.7 Code is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.3 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

Kimi K2.7 Code scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.9 versus 37.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper