Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 34.5.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.051.1
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1229

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13071472
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts12861457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.27

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math12811465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert12761476
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English12651436
LMArena Chinese13461487
LMArena Russian12661444
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Spanish—1452

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following12771437

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query13421457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text12881447
LMArena Creative Writing12641435
LMArena Multi-Turn12841456

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.1 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper