Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 35.1.
- Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.2 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $3.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 78.1% |
| LMCA | — | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.5 |
Math Qwen3.6 27B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 91.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3.6 27B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 27B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.6 27B?
Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.2 vs 39.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.6 27B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.