Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.0

Rank #123 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 35.1.
  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.642.0
Released—2026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Coding13071410
LMArena WebDev—1254
SciCode—29.3%

Reasoning Too close to call

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861400
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Math12811404
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Expert12761408
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English12651378
LMArena Chinese13461457
LMArena Russian12661376
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1367
LMArena Japanese—1325
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Spanish—1392

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following12771379

Long Context Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query13411389

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text12881395
LMArena Creative Writing12641346
LMArena Multi-Turn12841390

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper