Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 47.8 to 35.1.
- Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 42.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 28 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1410 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1254 |
| SciCode | — | 29.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 24.6 (#161)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1400 |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 10% |
| DTBench | — | 80% |
| LMCA | — | 29.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.52 |
Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 39.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1404 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 56% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 70% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.8 (#79)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.5% |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.0 (#127)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1457 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1376 |
| LMArena French | — | 1412 |
| LMArena German | — | 1367 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1392 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1379 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#127)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1389 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 57.9 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3.5 35B-A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1395 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1390 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?
Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.0 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.