Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.5 27B

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.9

Rank #127 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 27B in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 27B leads 59.3 to 48.7.
  • Qwen3.5 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5 27B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.641.9
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked1228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.9 (#168)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Coding13071427
LMArena WebDev—1358
WeirdML—39.5%
ALE-Bench—349.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.5 27B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
Vending-Bench 2—201.98

Reasoning Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3.5 27B: 27.5 (#117)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861414
NYT Connections (extended)—47.9%
Thematic Generalization—45.5%
DTBench—82.4%
LMCA—34%

Math Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.8 (#127)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Math12811429
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56.7%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.5 27B: 38.0 (#150)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Expert12761428
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.5 27B: 39.4 (#59)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Vision—1241

Multilingual Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3.5 27B: 50.8 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Non-English12651390
LMArena Chinese13461478
LMArena Russian12661390
LMArena French—1410
LMArena German—1393
LMArena Japanese—1345
LMArena Korean—1358
LMArena Spanish—1407

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3.5 27B: 73.5 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Instruction Following12771393

Long Context Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3.5 27B: 43.1 (#106)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Longer Query13411413

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 27B leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3.5 27B: 59.3 (#111)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5 27B
LMArena Text12881409
LMArena Creative Writing12641362
LMArena Multi-Turn12841410

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.5 27B?

Qwen3.5 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.5 27B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.2 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5 27B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 27B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper