Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 16.3.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 26.6 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | — |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1281 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.