Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen-14B
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.9 to 27.8.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 30.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1072 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1031 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1029 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen-14B?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.