Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 42.0 to 38.1.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.6 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1291 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1272 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1305 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1295 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1242 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1193 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1247 |
Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1341 | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 37.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.2 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.