Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Mistral Small 3.1

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 33.1 to 13.7.
  • Mistral Small 3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index38.031.4
Released—2025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked1228

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding13071309

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Hard Prompts12861278
Chess Puzzles—1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Math12811261
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Expert12761258
GPQA Diamond—41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Too close to call

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English12651255
LMArena Chinese13461254
LMArena Russian12661263
LMArena French—1270
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1210
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following12771264
IFEval—75%

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query13421300

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Mistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text12881278
LMArena Creative Writing12641253
LMArena Multi-Turn12841270
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.0 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Mistral Small 3.1 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 37.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper