Model comparison
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Pro in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 48.9.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 38.0 | 42.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1281 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1276 | 1479 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1265 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1266 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1470 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1458 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1277 | 1444 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1342 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1288 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1284 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.