Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3-8B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.5

Rank #344 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.1 to 7.8.
  • Llama 3-8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3-8B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index38.625.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1234

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#289)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Coding13071152
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Llama 3-8B: 14.3 (#326)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.45
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Llama 3-8B: 8.8 (#323)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Math12811151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#308)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Expert12761113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Llama 3-8B: 30.8 (#261)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12651098
LMArena Chinese13461076
LMArena Russian12661109
LMArena French—1159
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1004
LMArena Spanish—1173

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Llama 3-8B: 58.4 (#260)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12771127

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#251)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query13411128

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Llama 3-8B: 37.5 (#256)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3-8B
LMArena Text12881166
LMArena Creative Writing12641150
LMArena Multi-Turn12841152

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3-8B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 31.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3-8B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper